plus 3, Pam Tebow's Life Was Not Threatened in Pregnancy - RH Reality Check |
- Pam Tebow's Life Was Not Threatened in Pregnancy - RH Reality Check
- New Data: Teen pregnancy on the rise. Abortions too - WBIR
- Teen Pregnancy, Abortion Rates Rise - First Coast News
- Latest Articles - Lucianne.com
Pam Tebow's Life Was Not Threatened in Pregnancy - RH Reality Check Posted: 28 Jan 2010 10:59 AM PST
We have been reporting on the sudden shift in policy by CBS News on accepting advocacy ads during the Super Bowl just in time to accept $2.5 million from Focus on the Family for an ad that features Tim and Pam Tebow. Tim Tebow is a Heisman Trophy winner and a prospective NFL player. When pregnant with Tim, Pam Tebow was in the Philippines on a mission and became ill with amoebic dysentery. Early reports indicated that she was faced with a choice of continuing the pregnancy at the risk to her life. That appears not to be true. Indeed the very facts of the situation are now in question. During a bible study class, Pam Tebow related that "during that pregnancy, a Philippine doctor suggested that she abort the fetus because the strong medications she was being treated with for amoebic dysentery, which she had contacted early in the pregnancy, could cause serious disabilities to the fetus." Suggested that she abort the pregnancy? Or laid out the various risks that were possible, leaving her to her own judgment and choices? Made a definitive judgment that the fetus would unquestionably be harmed? Or described the risks of the medication necessary to treat the dysentery, including possible risks to the fetus? All of these are very different scenarios than the ones earlier suggested. The Tebows are fundamentalist Christians and are "anti-choice" which, as Amanda Marcotte points out, in effect makes them "pro-choice," because they have a choice to make even when circumstances are not ideal. Pam Tebow relates that given her faith, having an abortion--which no one has suggested she should have done in any case--was not an option.
Again...her choice, and one she seeks to take away from other women, men, and their families. But....the operative words here: "could cause serious disabilities." This indeed changes the whole narrative, and makes even more suspicious the trotting out of Pam Tebow as an anti-choice spokesperson. First, as someone who herself had to be on strong medication during both of the pregnancies with my now 10- and 13-year old children, and indeed whose own health was at serious risk, the issue of "risks that could cause" problems is very different than receiving a definitive diagnosis either that something is proved to be wrong or that this pregnancy might or will kill you. In conjunction with my physicians, I calculated and considered the risks at every step of the way of two extraordinarily difficult pregnancies. I took risks in the interest of myself and my children in both pregnancies, hoping for the best. I don't consider myself a heroine or with any special story to share. Millions of women calculate risks every day for the children they have, for the ones they may bear, and for other reasons; indeed we all--men and women--calculate risks every day of our lives, and we do so on behalf of our children, unless of course we keep each of them locked in a closet. (Mine are not.) Moreover, I had an abortion at an earlier point in my life, which was absolutely the right choice for me, enabled me to be a prepared and mature parent when I did have children, and about which I have absolutely no regrets. But Tebow's story is being used to "pave the way for her to find a new platform to use her influence." Since the first interview early last year, for example, "Pam Tebow has been contacted by pro-life organizations requesting her to keynote upcoming conventions and gatherings. She said she is excited about the opportunity to share her pro-life beliefs and has already been scheduled for appearances and speeches in Dallas and Louisville." So...a story that has been reported for some years on and off, and around which Pam Tebow is now building a career all of a sudden becomes a very promising cash cow for Focus on the Family, which is spending $2.5 million on an ad after having laid off hundreds of employees because of budget crises. Focus on the Family, which describes itself as "helping families thrive," is hoping to use this ad to drive donations to its website. How's the thriving going among those families with employees laid off from the organization, Dr. Dobson? Moreover, as pointed out this afternoon by the Center for Reproductive Rights, abortion is illegal in the Philippines, again calling the story itself into question. As noted in a CRR press release today:
Abortion was criminalized in the Philippines in 1870 and has been illegal in the country ever since. There are no exceptions to the law. Abortion is even prohibited when a woman's life or health is in danger. Women are punished with imprisonment between two to six years if they obtain one. Doctors and midwives who directly cause or assist a woman in an abortion face six years imprisonment and may have their licenses suspended or revoked. Because of the severity of the Philippines law, abortion is underground, says CRR: making it unsafe, potentially deadly and highly stigmatized. Every year, more than 500,000 women in the country try to terminate their pregnancies. In 2008 alone, criminal abortions resulted in the deaths of at least 1000 women and 90,000 more suffered complications.
So....was Tebow's doctor ignorant of the law and policy of his or her own country? Or, was the doctor willing to skirt the law for a relatively wealthy (in the context of the extreme poverty in the Philippines) white woman from the United States? Or did the doctor, again, merely lay out the range of options should it be found that the possible risks of a medication or the possible side effects of the medication should she opt to take it? CRR today sent a letter to CBS, calling on the network's Standards and Practices Department to reconsider running the ad. "While the exact content of the advertisement has not been revealed yet, the commercial is expected to recount the story of Pam Tebow's pregnancy in 1987," noted CRR. Let's be clear then: Pam Tebow's story appears to have morphed into something it is not for the purpose of marketing and proseltyzing. Tebow's own personal choices are irrelevant to the broader context of every and any other individual woman seeking to become pregnant, avoid pregnancy, or make the decisions that are right for her about a possible or existing pregnancy, no matter what label she applies to herself. Each woman is unique; each situation is unique; each woman acting as a moral agent on behalf of herself, and her family, with her medical advisors or whomever she chooses to engage has the right and the need to exercise these choices in the moment in her life such choices are relevant and based on her own "celebration of life." And on this the vast majority of Americans agree.
Five Filters featured article: Chilcot Inquiry. Available tools: PDF Newspaper, Full Text RSS, Term Extraction. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
New Data: Teen pregnancy on the rise. Abortions too - WBIR Posted: 27 Jan 2010 08:30 AM PST The teen years are a time of firsts: First car, first love and increasingly, first child. A sexual and reproductive health think-tank called the Guttmacher Institute has released data that show the number of pregnant teens rose 3% in 2006. That's a reversal from sharp declines of more than 40% seen during the 1990s. The Institute's Heather Boonstra says a focus on abstinence-only sex education in the 2000s simply didn't work, and suggests adding Birth Control 101 to sex ed. "Programs that teach about both actually show to help teens delay sexual activity, help them to have fewer sexual partners, and help them to use contraceptives more consistently," Boonstra explained. The new numbers echo previous data from the Centers for Disease Control, which found an uptick in the number of teens not only getting pregnant, but carrying babies to full term. "An increase in teen birth rates could either mean that fewer teens are getting abortions, or it means that there are more pregnancies overall, and what this data shows is that there are more pregnancies overall," says Boonstra. The Guttmacher report shows a 1% "increase" in abortions in 2006. The CDC is expected to release additional teen pregnancy data later this spring. Five Filters featured article: Chilcot Inquiry. Available tools: PDF Newspaper, Full Text RSS, Term Extraction. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Teen Pregnancy, Abortion Rates Rise - First Coast News Posted: 26 Jan 2010 09:07 AM PST NEW YORK CITY -- The teen pregnancy rate in the USA rose 3 percent in 2006, the first increase in more than a decade, according to data out today. The data also show higher rates of births and abortions among girls 15-19. The numbers, calculated by the Guttmacher Institute, a non-profit group that studies reproductive and sexual health, show a clear reversal from the downward trend that began in the 1990s. About 7 percent of teen girls got pregnant in 2006, a rate of 71.5 pregnancies per 1,000 teens. That's up slightly from 69.5 in 2005, Guttmacher says. In 1990, when rates peaked, about 12 percent got pregnant. Just as the long-term declines in teen pregnancy were for all racial and ethnic groups, the rise in 2006 was for all demographics, the report shows. Guttmacher and others suggest the increase is related to a focus on abstinence-only sex education programs under the Bush administration. Funding for abstinence doubled from 2000 to 2003, to $120 million. By 2008, funding was at $176 million. Guttmacher is an outspoken opponent of abstinence-only education. "The focus on abstinence and the shifts in pregnancy occurred about the same time," says Guttmacher's Lawrence Finer. "The issue here is clearly that we have a lot of teenagers who are having sex, but they aren't careful enough at contraception to avoid pregnancy," says Sarah Brown, executive director of the nonprofit National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy, who has seen Guttmacher's numbers. Some speculated a rise in teen birth rates reported last year was a result of fewer abortions, but the data show otherwise. "There isn't enough evidence to say there's a causal relationship, but pregnancies overall are increasing, regardless of whether they're carried to term or not," Finer says. Those on the other side cry foul. "To me, it appears to be another opportunity to throw a barb at abstinence education," says Valerie Huber of the National Abstinence Education Association. She says that only a quarter of federal funding for teen sexuality programs went to abstinence in 2008. In 2006, two-thirds of all teen pregnancies were to ages 18-19; data do not reflect marital status. Guttmacher's analysis shows a 4% increase in the teen birth rate and a 1 percent rise in abortion rates, based on federal statistics and Guttmacher's abortion research. The National Center for Health Statistics will release its pregnancy rate data later this year. ©2010 USA Today. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, rewritten, or redistributed.Five Filters featured article: Chilcot Inquiry. Available tools: PDF Newspaper, Full Text RSS, Term Extraction. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Latest Articles - Lucianne.com Posted: 26 Jan 2010 03:26 PM PST
2009 Lucianne.com Media Inc. 3495851465 - US Five Filters featured article: Chilcot Inquiry. Available tools: PDF Newspaper, Full Text RSS, Term Extraction. |
You are subscribed to email updates from Add Images to any RSS Feed To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 |
No comments:
Post a Comment